Is it my imagination or do these people have some of the nitpickiest QC editors in the world.
I am reading their "Issues" that they sent me, and I have to go back and tell them things like:
"The answer to this question is already in my narrative three different time, explianed in full detail, in question 1.1, question 3.2 and question 5.4 (a)
But yes, the employee did stand on one leg, stick his finger in his belly button and say 'Welcome to Tennessee Tom's Tattoo Trailer, Two tatoos for twenty today'? as required in the manual."
These were my first jobs for this company, and although the pay was decent, I'm not sure it was justified by the time I spent doing the tedious reports or by the amount of time I have spent dealing with nitpicking.
Is it just me having a bad day, or are they always like this?
I am reading their "Issues" that they sent me, and I have to go back and tell them things like:
"The answer to this question is already in my narrative three different time, explianed in full detail, in question 1.1, question 3.2 and question 5.4 (a)
But yes, the employee did stand on one leg, stick his finger in his belly button and say 'Welcome to Tennessee Tom's Tattoo Trailer, Two tatoos for twenty today'? as required in the manual."
These were my first jobs for this company, and although the pay was decent, I'm not sure it was justified by the time I spent doing the tedious reports or by the amount of time I have spent dealing with nitpicking.
Is it just me having a bad day, or are they always like this?