@Nataliekorn wrote:
Check out this thread [www.mysteryshopforum.com]
Look for the post where someone says you can email them to ask them. They emailed me the name of the company.
@Sybil2 wrote:
Nataliekorn, I would not encourage these back-handed tactics. You are still breaking your ICA if you link MSC and client name together. It does not matter if it is n this forum, by PM, by e-mail or smoke signal. It is still a violation of your ICA.
@Sybil2 wrote:
But you are perpetuating bad behavior and encouraging the breaking of the ICAs by doing so. It is a very simple FORUM rule.
@myst4au wrote:
I truly don't understand what you are objecting to. The poster provided a link to an existing message. The message was from a scheduler. Nothing in the scheduler's message violated a forum rule or encouraged breaking an ICA. If you take issue with the message from the scheduler, report it and ask to have it deleted. is that it? Are you objecting to the scheduler having suggested that people contact them for additional information? If that is it, how does that encourage breaking an ICA? What is the bad behavior? Reading messages and providing links to existing messages which do not IMHO break any rules?
@Sybil2 wrote:
But you are perpetuating bad behavior and encouraging the breaking of the ICAs by doing so. It is a very simple FORUM rule.
@Nataliekorn wrote:
Thank you! I don't get what the problem is. Oh well.