@Sybil2 wrote:
@BirdyC wrote:
Just because you did not respond personally to me doesn't mean you weren't including me in your general statement. Surely you were referring to someone? Weren't you? And since you mentioned a specific issue, which only two or three people here have referred to, my assumption wasn't a stretch in any way.
@BirdyC, there you go ASSuming again. There were three other people involved. You had a 1 in 3 chance of getting it right. Guess what? You were wrong. I recommend that you stay away from Las Vegas. The odds are not in your favor.
Sybil, you really need to learn how to read. There is nothing in my quoted statement that should lead you to believe I ASSumed your comments were targeted specifically and only at me. I wrote, "...including me in your general statement." "Including," in case you've forgotten, means one among others. I also stated that my assumption wasn't a stretch. Which it wasn't. As any
reasonable person would agree.
Of course, you will probably find a way to further argue your point in order to make yourself look superior. If that is so important to you, go right ahead. It's quite sad when someone wants to make herself or himself appear better than everyone else by sniping and being petty to others.
Try taking a nice pill, at least for the holiday season. You might find that makes you look like a reasonable human being. Hell, you don't even have to be nice. Being polite and tactful would work.
BTW, I do quite well in Las Vegas, thank you very much.
I learn something new every day, but not everyday!
I've learned to never trust spell-check or my phone's auto-fill feature.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/09/2015 01:22PM by BirdyC.