IMYST: New movie theater shops???

Checked jobslinger too late today and missed out on Imyst $25.00 movie theater shops in Lodi, NJ and Fresh Meadows, NY. Can anybody elaborate about what is involved here with this new shop and client???

Create an Account or Log In

Membership is free. Simply choose your username, type in your email address, and choose a password. You immediately get full access to the forum.

Already a member? Log In.

Now this request, unlike Arch's other request about hearing aids, which I did not believe invited an ICA violation, may be a little too specific. This one looks like an ICA violation waiting to happen. Arch's repeated requests are the reason CANDAMOMMY has lost patience, although that doesn't justify folloowing Arch around to argue about the validity of all his requests. I agree with Arch's other request not being an ICA violation request. I think this oine is, and no way will I answer it.

[www.mysteryshopforum.com]
rofl, what am I missing? People ask this question all the time, and get multiple answers that do not violate ICAs.

"There's so much trouble in this world; surrounded by miracles" - Citizen Cope
I didn't know they had more than one client. For months, I've only seen one client available sad smiley

I like movie shops, those are some of my favorites
The client is not listed at all. How on earth is this an ICA violation?

There are reasons that a body stays in motion
At the moment only demons come to mind
@bgriffin wrote:

The client is not listed at all. How on earth is this an ICA violation?

It could be merely a difference of interpretation. Arch's question was " Can anybody elaborate about what is involved here with this new shop and client???" Perhaps Arch meant only "how difficult is this shop?" which would not violate anything, but I took his request for elaboration to be a request for the specifics of the requirements. Going into detail about the requirements of a MSC's shop, whether the client is specifically mentioned or not, does seem to me to be a violation of confidentiality.
I interpreted it exactly as you did. I just don't see where the violation is.

Perhaps if there was some odd supersecret requirement but people talk about things like what observations are required and how much narrative is required all the time. I have never found it to be a violation. It's not like he asked for a list of questions.

By your argument you violated your ICA when you said this:

@roflwofl wrote:

There is a third company that does Freddy's. I like the third company's shop better than the other two. It reimburses a full meal for two, regardless of how much it is, requires purchase of two combos and two ice cream desserts, and pays a $5 fee.

There are reasons that a body stays in motion
At the moment only demons come to mind
Can't wait for Spring to get here! Everyone is so on edge lately....lol!!! It must be a late Winter cabin fever thing...

Thank goodness I'm too stupid to be mental!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login