@Itsybitsy1 wrote:
Re: Rejected shop (2nd one - I have done 11 with no problems)
No email was sent to me telling me the shop was rejected. I downloaded the guidelines for the second shop and it did not say automatically rejected. It said accepted which leaves room to ask where the validation photo was.
Then to interpret to reject a shop when the instructions I have downloaded does not say that. It says would not be accepted, not rejected which seems like one would ask for the validation photo as other companies do so.
My email to Mr.Williams:
The actual photo of the tv was black when I looked at it. Strange. It was surrounded by the business card a channel listing. I found Bree's comment and interpretation of not accepted the same as rejected interesting. Shows you do not respect your shoppers as decency of most organizations is to ask for the missing item. Not on a hit or miss email ( if you choose to notify the shopper). Rather you just choose to reject the shop with no notice to shoppers. I have done 11 shops for you.However, at this point, I see no reason to continue. I am not willing to invest my time for menial money with concern for not being able to correct an item with no notification at times to do so and your interpretation of will not be accepted vs. rejected and not paid which was not stipulated in the shop. As you will note I sent a picture of the room showing coming soon phones.
just stumbled onto this and while there seems to be a lot of charges/counter-charges about different types/kinds of assignments pertaining to second-to-none there does seem to be perhaps issues with your Iitsybitsy1) failure to read/understand/comply with guidelines. i'm seeing a past issue with a restaurant assignment and now an issue with some sort of television or appliance store (?) and a television that wasn't on. So, to cut to the chase...you failed to properly time something at the restaurant and now you failed to provide the photos which were part of this assignment.
do i detect a pattern?
also. lisastl is a valuable contributor to this blog (much more than myself) and she's spot on with her criticism/analysis of the degree professionalism that you have demonstrated in the 2 issues that you've raised.
also, i find that "rejected" and not "accepted" to be synonymous, too.
also, (yep i do sometimes go onandonandonandon) it's not the duty/job of a scheduler to interact pertaining to editing issues (maybe it is for a mom and pop company) and the acceptance/rejection of a report/shop.
also, (see mea culpa above)... your singling out scheduler Bree for your unwarranted rant/vent is misguided and misplaced as she is one of the best of the best (and i rank second to none at close to the top of the food chain). i've found Bree to to communicative, proactive and is always willing to be accommodating.
and...i strongly suggest 2 things...
1. some kind of reading comprehension course/class (probably online which might be more convenient)
2. some kind of course/class that might help you improve your writing skills (not to be rude but...they're crappy.
edited to add: nope, i don't work for either second to none or their client and nope, i'm not related to or married to or engaged to or dating or having an affair with: Bree, lisastl or Mr. Williams.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/04/2017 09:39PM by parkcitybrian.