I worked for an insurance company for many years. They provided office space and supplies for agents who were not company employees, but rather independent contractors. Because of the degree of control over those independent contractors, my employer got slapped hard by the IRS who deemed these agents to be employees, not ICs. There continue to be repurcussions years later. Not just for the insurance company, but also for the agents, as they had to go find and fund an office space or change careers.
I think the mystery shopping companies have a valid concern, and they're trying to be proactive. I don't know if this is the best approach, but it is the one Maritz has chosen.
Having worked in the insurance industry for 29 years, though, I have concerns about the Maritz requirement to provide proof of insurance. That is not an uncommon requirement from an employer, since actions (and accidents!) on the part of an employee acting in the course of their assigned duties results in employer liability. In those instances employees require proof of insurance since they want the employee/driver's insurance carrier to provide primary coverage.
If the person involved in the accident is an independent contractor, then the sole recourse should be against the driver. By asking for proof of insurance it seems that Maritz is wanting to make sure that if Maritz gets sued the driver has the necessary insurance--just like if they were an employee.
A better stance in the "independent contractor" push might be "We do not employ Mr/s Smith, we have no contractual relationship, we do not direct Mr/s Smith's actions, and as such we have no liability for this incident."
I must be missing something in all the SSN vs FEIN discussions. Regardless under which number I work and am paid, I can't see how my taxes would be any different. If I make above "$X" in a year, regardless of whether I get any 1099s, I owe tax. Period. I'm fairly new to mystery shopping, though, so it's entirely possible I'm missing a portion of the tax equation, so I'm staying tuned.
In the past two months I have completed 33 shops for Maritz. I have found them to be fair, flexible, and fast payers. It initially really bothered me that I couldn't effectively communicate with them via e-mail, only by phone. I have a full-time job with a governmental agency, and can't take/make personal calls during work hours. So, now I let the calls go to my cellphone voicemail, and return calls on breaks. I still wish I could deal with them via e-mail, because I can't be sure the scheduler I need will be available at breaktime, and e-mail eliminates that, but the schedulers are so great to work with it's become a "non-issue" for me.
I have had a business license for some time, so the new Maritz requirements aren't going to be burdensome for me--I'll just have to get a FEIN. I recognize that the procedures, and costs, for business licensing vary by state, and there may be some states in which it may not be worth it.
So, for now, I'm just taking a "wait and see" approach. I'm enjoying reading the posts, though, as this is a pretty big departure from the current "norm" and I like to hear other shoppers' thoughts on the topic.
Happy shopping, Carla