@purpleicee wrote:
But why are all the responses from MF breaking down the wording of the agreement to add statements that contradict what the agreement states? Why is it that the agreement cannot be worded correctly to include what MF is saying it actually means, because the agreement definitely states the contrary.
@Isaiah4031a wrote:
I was planning on going out of town in an few months and I was planning on doing a shop.
I have always been paid by Direct Deposit..
So if the total pay is $ 35.00 and that is the only shop I do, It will be direct deposit to my bank account?
@guysmom wrote:
But it still doesn't specify that DD is NOT impacted by the $50 limit...all it says is that it's the quickest and easiest way to get paid. I think further clarification is still necessary!
@Morledzep wrote:
@Isaiah4031a wrote:
I was planning on going out of town in an few months and I was planning on doing a shop.
I have always been paid by Direct Deposit..
So if the total pay is $ 35.00 and that is the only shop I do, It will be direct deposit to my bank account?
Until they correct the agreement so that it says so clearly, I would not count on it. The schedulers and office personnel can say anything they want. They aren't putting it in the ICA agreement, and an email with false information means nothing.
@purpleicee wrote:
And it stated the gift card program is subject to the program's FEES AND RULES, which may be modified from time to time.
Why would they charge someone a fee to use a gift card that already benefited MF for not having to pay them their actual money?
The whole thing is obscure. These unidentified people popping in on this thread or their emails being quoted as an explanation, remind me when a 'fast-talker' is trying to trick you or keeps repeating the same thing in a different order, but never really is clear.
Thank you, @mfisherri, for coming on here and answering this on behalf of MF. HOWEVER...as others have pointed out, the **CONTRACT** is the legally binding document, and as of 7:45 pm last evening, it HAD NOT CHANGED ITS VERBIAGE to reflect more clearly that there would be NO CHANGES to the amount of earnings being required for DD.@mfisherri wrote:
The answer is yes, the DD would still be made as usual. We are not changing the way we process DD's at this time. .
Well, I am choosing not to sign anything for the time being, while the verbiage is the same. I will wait and see how shoppers report DD payments for amounts less than $50.00, to see if they are receiving them monthly. Then, after a period of 3-4 continuous months of shoppers receiving less than $50/month DD, I may sign on. We'll see.@myst4au wrote:
If and when they decide to change the agreement (even to clarify terms), we will all have to accept and agree to the new version. Until you are asked to sign a revised agreement, there is no value in reading the agreement for changes.