@mystery2me wrote:
Wow I would be upset too if I got deactivated and accused of fraud. Honestly I would not care to work with them again, but it would eat me up too. You don't really give enough details for us to see both sides of the issue. The guidelines for that shop do state a shop will be disqualified for "... rushing employee, stating you only have a certain amount of time, etc." I'm not saying you did any of that, and those reasons are kind of vague. But if you are sure it is just a case of mistaken identity, or the accusation of fraud is out of line, and you feel strongly enough to spend a bunch of time on it it, I would go up the company ladder. Look for contacts on the MSC's web page.
Edited to add: But in the end, even if you make your case and convince the MSC, the client has the last word and there may be nothing that can be done about that.
Thank you for editing your post, much appreciated!
Post deleted for quoting another post with violation as well as using initials of Client in post when MSC name in thread title. Feel free to edit out the violations and then re-post.
@shopperbob wrote:
If 360 Relay is the former Goodwin Hospitality, your situation is not at all surprising.
@mystery2me wrote:
I'm not sure how a video would prove the case either way, unless it has audio, Or if the employee is mistakenly atrributing another cusotmer's comments to you, and the video would clear that up. But if the employee is simply lying, there is not much that can be done. Either the company take the mystery shops seriously or they don't.
That has always been one of my fears, that an employee or manager gets upset enough at a low score (or fear of a low score) that they falsely accuse me of something in an effort to get me deactivated. I've been threatened a couple of times on revealed audits. All I can do is stay professional and try to do things by the book, and hope my record speaks for itself. But I've read enough stories on this forum to know that even the better MSCs don't always have the final say in these matters.
@kisekinecro wrote:
@mystery2me wrote:
I'm not sure how a video would prove the case either way, unless it has audio, Or if the employee is mistakenly atrributing another cusotmer's comments to you, and the video would clear that up. But if the employee is simply lying, there is not much that can be done. Either the company take the mystery shops seriously or they don't.
That has always been one of my fears, that an employee or manager gets upset enough at a low score (or fear of a low score) that they falsely accuse me of something in an effort to get me deactivated. I've been threatened a couple of times on revealed audits. All I can do is stay professional and try to do things by the book, and hope my record speaks for itself. But I've read enough stories on this forum to know that even the better MSCs don't always have the final say in these matters.
Yes I would love to know as well, what make this whole case worse and fishy is that when I asked for the video, just to be sure the one in the video is me, she refuse and just said she is not at liberty to share the video, and when I tried to asked what appeal am I wearing in the video, she just ignore and does not response anymore
@mjt9598 wrote:
The MSPs would probably rather lose a shopper than a client.
@DRJ wrote:
And you never returned to dine there again? I would never darken the door of any establishment that accused me of that.
@DRJ wrote:
I was just curious if you ever went back.
It is a Forum violation to list the Client in the post when the MSC has been named in the title of the thread. Please feel free to edit out the violation and then re-post.