I've had this happen more than once. One cell phone shop in Austin *never* populates an address, only GPS coordinates. Another one was sent back because the street was known by more than one name, and of course the one Timestamp used was different from the one on the shop. That kind of stuff is out of our control.
Since you've already emailed the editor, what I would do is put another note in the very last text box of the form (I think it's the one that asks if you would buy the first or second recommended device.) Put your answer to that question, then skip a line and put something like this:
"Note: The picture submitted is of the correct location (123 Main St, Anytown AL) for this shop. The timestamp app picked up an address on the cross street at the intersection of Main St and 1st St. This is beyond my control, as I was at the correct location."
Since the editor didn't "get it" after your original email, I would rephrase it and be as clear and concise as possible (not that you weren't the first time.) If you need to argue your case further with Ipsos or the editor, I'd look in Google Maps for their street-level picture of the location. It may help, especially if it shows neighboring businesses that were included in your photo. They've got some new editors; one of my shops got a 9 with a note I've never seen before.
$12 and way too much narrative for a cell phone shop. I hate doing these. Let us know what happens.
If your path dictates you walk through hell, do it as though you own the place. -unknown