yeah...i got one. i know that there are lots of folks who don't like to get on the bad side of editors/mscs/clients, etc and are reticent when it comes to specifics like names of schedulers, editors, mscs, clients, etc. but i don't have an issue with that. i'm the first one to call out those who deserve it and the # 1 offender when it comes to having editors that are beyond the pale is..............intellishop.
their editors are so wrong, so much of the time and will never, ever admit any failings (kinda/sorta like a current politician?) but make silly, condescending remarks like "2 points deducted for grammar" or some other such nonsense and then refuse to say what was wrong.
if their pay structure warranted the continual, constant nitpicking i might be able to excuse it but the pittance that they offer combined with their editors and then throw in the dreaded "multiple drop-down windows" that go onandonandonandon and intellishop heads my 10' pole list.