@lochquel wrote:
For more exposure! For someone that worked 2+ years for a company and to get shutout seems alarming to me and hopefully others.
@sandyf wrote:
I am not sure the metro areas are harder to get. When I first signed up with them I was invited very quickly to a training. Right now with half the number of shops as in the past they do have twice as many shoppers as they used to need. For a very long time I was given the same locations month after month. I assume it was because there was only one other shopper in my area as I would think they would like some sort of rotation. Now with one shop per month per location instead of two I do not get each of them every month. They actually assigned me a location I never said I would do a couple of months ago. I did it as it was fairly close to my home.
On Jan. 1, when you receive your first assignment, this will be clearer. The website will make more sense as will some of the links including "shops I will accept." This MSC does things differently as the more than five pages of posts attest. The times are set by the client/MSC. The dates offer some flexibility within certain guidelines (one shop has to be done the first week.) After a couple of months you will be the expert who guides the next batch of newbies. Cheers!@HonnyBrown wrote:
If you need to change the locations or times you originally applied for, how do you do that? Also, what if you are assigned a location or time that no longer works for you?
@JASFLALMT wrote:
Thank goodness there is no more narrative. Even so, keep in mind that the people who work there are crew members, never employees. There are some terms the client is persnickety about and that's one of them. And they never use race in descriptions and the only time you need a name is when you make the phone call.
All good points to mention. I have had editors say one should, no matter how many times in the same report, keep saying the male at Tortilla 1 or the female manager at Salsa 1 (even when there is just one person at each position.) I go with the flow. I keep doing it until another editor says stop ... In my experience, editing notes are brief and cite the particular question number for future reference. I use hair color and haven't been told not to, but never say never.@DareWright wrote:
@JASFLALMT wrote:
I've also learned that there is little consistency between editors. Some tell you not to mention hair color, others tell you to. I always mention hair color. Some tell you not to mention the type of shirt the manager wears (Henley, polo, etc.) and others have asked me to detail the type of shirt in the report. It gets frustrating at times.
Oops. Thanks.@JASFLALMT wrote:
Pua, your quoted post above of what DareWright said looks like I said it...I didn't. My editor(s) are consistent. I think it's probably always the same person for my stores. I always only say "tortilla" or "tortilla warmer" if there is only one person there or "salsa" if there is only one crew member there. I only number it if there are two people at each station and no one has ever questioned it.
@PuaM wrote:
All good points to mention. I have had editors say one should, no matter how many times in the same report, keep saying the male at Tortilla 1 or the female manager at Salsa 1 (even when there is just one person at each position.) I go with the flow. I keep doing it until another editor says stop ... In my experience, editing notes are brief and cite the particular question number for future reference. I use hair color and haven't been told not to, but never say never.@DareWright wrote:
@JASFLALMT wrote:
I've also learned that there is little consistency between editors. Some tell you not to mention hair color, others tell you to. I always mention hair color. Some tell you not to mention the type of shirt the manager wears (Henley, polo, etc.) and others have asked me to detail the type of shirt in the report. It gets frustrating at times.
@weatherman2111 wrote:
@PuaM wrote:
All good points to mention. I have had editors say one should, no matter how many times in the same report, keep saying the male at Tortilla 1 or the female manager at Salsa 1 (even when there is just one person at each position.) I go with the flow. I keep doing it until another editor says stop ... In my experience, editing notes are brief and cite the particular question number for future reference. I use hair color and haven't been told not to, but never say never.@DareWright wrote:
@JASFLALMT wrote:
I've also learned that there is little consistency between editors. Some tell you not to mention hair color, others tell you to. I always mention hair color. Some tell you not to mention the type of shirt the manager wears (Henley, polo, etc.) and others have asked me to detail the type of shirt in the report. It gets frustrating at times.
Also, all the editor "notes" apparently get held against you for future ratings, even when the contradict each other.
@weatherman2111 wrote:
Also, all the editor "notes" apparently get held against you for future ratings, even when the contradict each other.
@weatherman2111 wrote:
They never really get in contact with us in any substantive way. There's no way to ask them question back, so when they send a note and you're not sure what they mean there's no way to clear it up. The schedulers aren't always of much help clearing things up either as no one really knows what the other is doing. They also keep changing things in terms of who handles what as I am not on my 3rd scheduler in the last 4 months since they canned the good one.
@weatherman2111 wrote:
They never really get in contact with us in any substantive way. There's no way to ask them question back, so when they send a note and you're not sure what they mean there's no way to clear it up. The schedulers aren't always of much help clearing things up either as no one really knows what the other is doing. They also keep changing things in terms of who handles what as I am not on my 3rd scheduler in the last 4 months since they canned the good one.
Deanna is mine. She is always available, too.@AustinMom wrote:
@weatherman2111 wrote:
They never really get in contact with us in any substantive way. There's no way to ask them question back, so when they send a note and you're not sure what they mean there's no way to clear it up. The schedulers aren't always of much help clearing things up either as no one really knows what the other is doing. They also keep changing things in terms of who handles what as I am not on my 3rd scheduler in the last 4 months since they canned the good one.
WOW. What a shame that there has been so much turnover in your area. I have had the same scheduler, Michelle, who is wonderful, for several years. She performs shops for the same clients herself and she is very available. I'm not one to communicate a lot with schedulers or editors - I just want to get my assignments, to do them, report, and get paid - but I don't think MIchelle ever sleeps. She must be on call 24/7. I was accidentally shorted on payment once, e-mailed Michelle; she contacted Accounts Payable for me, and I was paid within hours. I've not had a problem with editors, but if I did, I would immediately e-mail Michelle. She seems to be on top of everything. Reading your comments about schedulers who don't know what the other is doing and getting canned and replaced, I appreciate Michelle all the more. She's a gem!
@Isaiah4031a wrote:
How long does it take for a scheduler to reply back with training information? I know they are busy.
Thanks
@Isaiah4031a wrote:
How long does it take for a scheduler to reply back with training information? I know they are busy.
Thanks