@Sybil2 wrote:
@jnoyolapicazzo, do a forum search on Sentry for the past year and you will be kept busy with all the reading. Enjoy!
@SteveSoCal wrote:
@Sybil2 wrote:
@jnoyolapicazzo, do a forum search on Sentry for the past year and you will be kept busy with all the reading. Enjoy!
That has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
@SteveSoCal wrote:
There was a complaint, the MSC reached out to possibly correct the issue and was then rebuffed. The point jnoyolapicazzo made is valid. Your complaint falls on deaf ears with me if you wont take reasonable steps to resolve it.
@Sybil2 wrote:
I am not sure why you are quoting my short and simple post. I never said anything about the MSC reaching out being good or bad.
You love making ASSumptions but you have the right to do that. I was not taking a jab at Sentry or jnoyolapicazzo. My post was quite neutral. I received a nice PM from one of the people in question. But if you want to ASSume what I am thinking, I wish you luck with that adventure.@SteveSoCal wrote:
@Sybil2 wrote:
I am not sure why you are quoting my short and simple post. I never said anything about the MSC reaching out being good or bad.
There are a few things that seem obvious to me:
1. Your 'short and simple post' was sarcastic and intended to take a jab at Sentry, as well as jnoyolapicazzo for defending them.
Gimme a break! How many times has a forum thread been completely derailed or hijacked into a totally unrelated topic. Making a quick reference to a MSC in a thread about that MSC is not going off-topic.@SteveSoCal wrote:
2. That topic was specifically about issues with editors at Sentry. You have stated that you prefer not to work for this MSC, so it would seem that you don't have much experience with the specific topic and were just misdirecting by attempting to bring up other issues with the MSC that have been discussed here.
I encourage everyone to do a forum search on whatever subject they want to. I have nothing to hide and no apologies. We are a diverse group here so not all personalities are going to be a cohesive unit.@SteveSoCal wrote:
4. Using your own logic; Anyone reading this should do a forum search for posts by you and make a decision if you are sarcastic and argumentative, or logical. Feel free to do the same with posts by me.
@Sentry Marketing wrote:
Perhaps we should follow the lead of the companies who don't monitor this forum or try to address issues reported by forum members.
I commend Sentry Marketing for responding to a thread about their company in this forum. And for keeping level-headed about it at this time.@Sentry Marketing wrote:
The purpose of my post was to try to resolve the issue reported by the OP and not to "argue' with the shopper.
@Flash wrote:
@Sentry Marketing wrote:
Perhaps we should follow the lead of the companies who don't monitor this forum or try to address issues reported by forum members.
@thunderdeacon wrote:
It was the gall to remind me to explain all no responses after the whole issue that escalated my anger at the time and made me feel doubly unappreciated.