The forum members will believe who they find more credible. The truth of the matter is that one of us is hiding behind anonymity and one isn't.
Within this thread, there are forum members who have posted that they have experienced a problem with Sentry and it was amicably resolved and their account has not been closed. This would seem to contradict several of your statements/accusations about Sentry and myself.
I am not always correct and Sentry is certainly not an error-free company. Like any other company, mistakes are made every day. Becuase we wanted to make it easy for shoppers to report mistakes and we wanted to hold ourselves accountable for resolving issues in a timely matter, we installed a ticketing system years ago. The supporting ticketing system provides us with a centralized location to address shopper questions that are not tied to an individual email box.
Because I don't know who, I can't respond with specifics to your accusations that we are unprofessional. Up to know, all you have done is post very vague comments attacking me, accusing me of blaming shoppers and being unprofessional. You are certainly entitled to your own opinion, however, you are not entitled to your own facts. I am not trying to bully or silence you. In fact, I welcome the feedback on our company and my own conduct and would be happy to explain both to members of this forum. The problem is that you won't provide details. In my opinion, your unwillingness to support what you've accused me and Sentry of with facts is nothing more than online bullying. I don't even know if we have interacted, so I can explain any action (like deactivating your account) that we have allegedly taken?
You claim that we accepted your shop and you also claim that the problem was never resolved. I'm curious, which is it? If we accepted your report, you should be paid. Why would you accept not being paid for an accepted assignment? Something doesn't add up.
The truth is that the Sentry team respects shoppers. We work to live up to a standard of treating every shopper in a patient, professional and pleasant manner and we expect shoppers to conduct themselves in the same way. Those shoppers who don't handle themselves in this way are deactivated. Every day on this forum, shoppers discuss being treated in a way that does not meet their expectations and state unequivocally that they won't complete assignments for a company any longer. How is it controversial when a company takes that same action?