SteveSoCal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> techman01 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > There is zero reason for a company to take 60
> days
> > to pay unless they
> > have cashflow problems.
>
> If that's the case, then how does the company that
> pays in 60 days purchase the company that pays
> twice a month?
>
> I can think of a number of reasons for an MSC to
> wait on paying shops. Why is it so unfathomable
> to think that it may be a business decision,
> rather than a cash flow issue? 30-60 days is a
> relatively standard time frame for the MS
> industry.
I disagree with you here. I have worked with dozens of msc's
over the years and the vast majority do not take 60 days to pay.
Most shops are paid on a set date by the msc the month following
the month a shop was completed in or sooner.
= + = + = + = + = + = + = + = + = + = + = +
There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots
==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==
When you try to please everybody, you end up pleasing nobody