@Jay C wrote:
They want new eyes and new impressions. Since Market Force guidelines are pretty specific and their reports are easy enough for a first-grader, it is not a tremendous plus for them to use experienced shoppers. . . . There is no seniority or longevity.
ICs, or MSCs, may never entirely know what went wrong, and why the ax fell. I appreciate MF's validations that are built into reports, specific guidelines, and the Help Desk. Where I live, experienced, successful shoppers will be called or emailed with shops that are not on the board.
In my history with MF, I have had four shops invalidated. One, justly so. Lesson learned. Two, were incorrectly invalidated. I responded, stating facts with specificity, with no personal pleas, and my shops were then approved for payment. The fourth is currently under consideration. The outcome could go either way, though I would expect guidelines to be cleaned up and clarified, whichever way the ball bounces.