@SteveSoCal wrote:
@shoptastic wrote:
@sandyf wrote:
And I think lumping all people in their 70's and 80's and 90s together when giving the mortality rate. is deceptively high for those seniors that are not in nursing homes who are much sicker than the at home senior population.
sandyf,
Just wondering if you had a citation/evidence for this fact (of nursing home seniors being more sick than non-nursing home seniors? It sounds intuitively plausible and somewhat probable even, but I haven't read anything that cements the fact (albeit, I haven't tried to look it up either). Thanks!
You can find some interesting statistics about age breakdowns and institutional facilities on the LA County DOPH site:
[publichealth.lacounty.gov]
While 4,153 current cases are people over 65...2.326 of those cases are residents of institutions, and 1,462 cases are institution staff! 384 out of the 913 deaths in LA Country are from institutions, so it's over 1/3 of the deaths and more than 50% of the infected over 65 who are in institutions....with more than 25% of the cases being related to institutions.
This is out of over 10 Million people, so it's pretty substantial evidence there is a high percentage of infection and even higher percentage of deaths for nursing home residents.
Thanks for the response, SSC.
I think maybe there was a misunderstanding (either in my interpreting sf's statement quoted above or your understanding of what I was asking).
I thought sandyf was saying that nursing home residents are "more sick" (i.e., having some pre-existing health conditions) vs. the non-nursing home senior population. I wondered where the evidence for that was.
Given health privacy laws, I wasn't sure if it would exist.